This is a cross-listed course: one can count its credit towards either
the ambiguous new English major, or the Art History major. While I understand
now that the teachings we’ve received during this semester cannot be fit into
any single one category, I’ll admit I
took this course based off my interest in the latter discipline. Coming at the
comics we’ve read this semester from a primarily-Art Historical perspective, I
can’t help but reference earlier lessons while viewing these works, and thus, I
also cannot help but approach this prompt in a similar fashion. Looking back at
artists throughout the ages, it’s plain to see that most of the greatest names
in art history stand out alone. The sole-authored/artistic process is a
time-honored tradition.
While I respect collaborative processes in the comic genre –indeed,
results show that they can make for extremely important, memorable projects—,
and there have certainly been similarly successful partnerships in the world of
“higher art” (I use quotations just to distinguish a collaborative comic from,
say Rauschenberg + J. Johns (there’s a whole debate in there too, I know)), I
think sole-authored comics are truest to form. By this I mean: comics artists
who create successful, impactful work by themselves (Tezuka, Ormes, Tatsumsi)
could be put in the same category as those famous lonewolf “high” artists we
revere throughout history; their singularly-created works receive the same
amount of passion, forethought, attention, and effort as those of individual “high”
artists. As Kirchner was a starving young artist, so too was Tezuka. Both
worked hard on their own and became leaders of their respective artistic movements.
Without the interjections of outside influences, they were able to create art
forms and spread messages about what they thought was important in the world,
just as so many competent individuals did before them, and will continue to do
so as the field transforms in its progression throughout time. Could they have
collaborated with others to create “Potzdammer Platz,” or Astro Boy? Sure. But would the products they turned out be as
wildly influential? Who’s to say? The inverse of that question can obviously be
asked of the makers of Watchmen, so
in all honesty both approaches can either fail or succeed if fate wills it. It
just strikes me that the artist has
occupied history in his/her exercise of individual expression; and it will
continue to be that way for some time to come.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.