Another complex and modernized
narrative of the superhero comic, this one goes the most in-depth in terms of the
superhero timeline and the ‘superhero’ collective idea that we have read so far
in this class. The author has spread the legacy of superheroes, and their
complex backgrounds onto a timeline, one that weaves back and forth from past
to present. The use of flashbacks are used so seamlessly, the cinematic feel to
the comic and its eye-catching raw beginning is what makes Watchmen completely
its own genre of comic.
Particularly like how ingrained
superheroes are into society and the way the author thinks about the
interactions, the government intervention and presence them, as well as the
debate of superhero intervention. All
topics previously tackled in comics like Superman and Batman, but never wholly
summed up in a dystopian universe. The identity and definition of superhero is
drastically unpacked in this society, which tests the superheroes’ obligation
to a public that openly rejects them. A big difference between comics demonstrating
this struggle then and now is the exposure of heroism on television. It is
interesting that the superheroes have visibility in the news and television,
freely giving their real names such as Doc Manhattan. It seems the media world
and reality are at ends in terms of superhero sentiment. There is a strange gap
between the need for heroes to save the city from ruining itself and their
willingness to be vulnerable under the scrutiny of the humans they’re trying so
hard to protect.
Panel wise, the comic does a
really good job with panel to panel scene closure, often mirroring poses to
provide juxtaposition in different environments; sentiments felt in one place
at one time come to mind when the character is in another location. Putting
these panels together is visually very effective. I also really appreciated Watchmen’s
storytelling capabilities that does not rely on big blocks of dialogue. Closer
closure that reveals close action to action sequences are more telling in its
implications than any text could achieve.
Another element I noticed was the
drastic color scenes and the bright vivid coloration of Watchmen. When there is
action or violence, the panels take on a redder hue or color scheme, rioting
scenes are fiery orange. Point of view, especially on page 65 was used very
effectively.
I agree that Watchmen provides a stark look into how identity can play into the superhero mold. But I also wonder if there is play in superhero-as-symbol. For hasn't Superman, in some way, always stood for idealized American influence, for the "right" way of stemming crime in the eyes of the nation. So could these comics be critiquing how we as a public force more meaning onto these characters and the weight that can cause on them? By expecting them to be more than human, do we sideline their humanity?
ReplyDelete