I feel like I have
just read a very intimate, nostalgic and emotional perspective on Japan’s
culture as affected by Hiroshima and the war. I saw some elements that I felt
were very important or prominent to its culture, told masterfully through icons
and images. As some panels showed, such as in page 18, Tatsumi was able to tell
a perspective through mere picture. I noticed some themes that continued
throughout the story. I really appreciated the way Tatsumi was able to “marry”
text and image, using both to tell his narrative. He also includes a lot of
aspect to aspect closure to highlight an entire place – Hiroshima.
I particularly enjoyed how each
story was very tightly wound, like little cinematic vignettes. I was a little
confused about some continuity but I like how each chapter was almost aspect to
aspect in itself; the chapters create a collective image of the effects of war.
The focus on a citywide perspective makes me think of Tardi’s way of showcasing
Paris. Like Tatsumi, Tardi also included a whole cast of characters, seemingly
unrelated, but all affected by a single entity or event.
I noticed several themes through
each of the chapters. Tatsumi was able to put together text and image to evoke
certain emotions or opinion about the mourning or coping. The hell as an
internal and external place was an excellent tension that Tatsumi displays. His
perception on image, especially with the introduction of the image on page 18
in the second row, was a perfect way to engage his reader. Personally, I also
thought it was a picture of a man choking a woman. When Tatsumi decides to
acknowledge and tie this into his story, it really shows his attention how you
can create tension just through image and perception.
In chapter 2, the theme of
impotence, continued with phallic images such as the canon revealed internal
through of the narrator through image. I wonder the importance of impotence in
Japanese culture, since I saw it as a common theme in Louis Chu’s Eat a Bowl of Tea. This novel also draws
attention to the main character’s inability to please his wife due to
impotence. I'm not sure what the significance is between men and their inability to please women sexually, but I'm wondering if this is also some sort of frustration from the war. In chapter 3, Tatsumi extends the aspect to aspect to become a metaphor by including a
seemingly unrelated story of a gruesome ritual to his main storyline. Tatsumi
was able to represent ideas of mourning, grief and the rotting away by
comparing it to gruesome ritual as a slow release from the bodily form for his
main character. The main character, like the hunted prey, literally ‘rots’ away
in his hell state. I wonder if he'll ever find refuge, or if his soul will ever be released from his guilt.
Tatsumi’s way of illustrating death,
mourning and the internal experience of the narrator through contextual image
is done beautifully in this novel.
I, too, noticed the powerful effect that Tatsumi's moment-to-moment and aspect-to-aspect transitions had on me. Based on our reading from McCloud's book, which named these two types of transition as distinctly Japanese, I was especially careful to make note of these. These subtle transitions help to give us a greater sense of Tatsumi's setting. This is especially important for stories such as these. As we discussed in class, Hiroshima is very much a character in each one. The subtle transitions also emphasize the daily drudgery that each of Tatsumi's characters (perhaps most notably the man from chapter two) find themselves struggling with. Tatsumi suggests that not only is life mundane but that the horrifying and depraved aspects of it have come to seem routine.
ReplyDelete