Some panels I found interesting was the use of cliffhangers, dynamic
panels that leave the reader hanging at the end of an ‘issue’. The detailed
background art is impressive. Her perspectives, close ups on faces and ways of
presenting dialogue is creative. One element I found a bit frustrating was the
amount of closure within the dialogue boxes. Whole events would be announced
not visually, but through a caption box. Some panels contain walls of text with
just recap.
Reading this through a contemporary lens has me struggling to determine
what this comic and this main character are attempting to accomplish. Literally,
who is Torchy? To me, she seems to be an unchanging, obsessive, passive
character, attempting to be on her own in sometimes obviously dangerous
environments. The transitions in the plot are quick and her conflicts are
identical, differing only in the male counterparts she becomes intensely
involved with. Torchy is highly motivated by her love interests and she moves from one lover to another without remorse or worry about
previous love interests. The story reads like a giant soap opera. Although this gets
the plot moving, I am not as captured in the action as I was in previously read
comics due to the intense focus on love interests.
In terms of Patty-Jo, it was very surreal, but interesting read to go
from long-term comics down to serial one pagers. Since there are no closures in
these one-panel works, elements of the pictorial sequence are instead place in
the comic, such as objects in the background, stamps, props or the clothing
herself. I again appreciate the intense detail put into the art and additional
interactive sections with the clothing. I especially enjoyed her attention to
detail when drawing fashion. Her comic was very up to date and she took time to
havePatty-Jo engaging readers with political or social issues.
I also particularly enjoyed the amount of voice, opinion and stance
Ormes was able to emulate through her characters. Sometimes, Patty-Jo felt like
a PSA or advertisement, a creative image designed to get its readers to do
something outside of the comic realm. Much of the topics in the comic
translated into real life, something that was not as strongly emphasized in
previous, more censored comics.
Merisa,
ReplyDeleteI too found it interesting that Ormes used her comic as a method of advertising. I'll be honest, I was a little annoyed whenever Ormes used her comic as a way to advertise the Patty-Jo dolls. To me, it felt like I was gypped out of a story. Where there should be a story about Patty-Jo, I instead got an ad for her doll. However, I appreciated the advertisements for specific charities. Although, just like with the doll ads, the advertisements for charities replaced space where a comic ought to be, I felt Ormes truly wanted her readers to be aware of the organization. I thought it clever that Ormes used her comic as a way to spread the word about meaningful charities. If Patty-Jo supports this charity, than her fans would support it too.