As, quite literally, this is the archetype for the American superhero, I am hesitant to be critical of the
Superman Chronicles blocky plot, limited lines and diversity of its panels due
to its paving the way for a whole era of superhero comics. Seeing past the bland
coloring and plot, the character Superman is interesting to analyze as he
interacts with his world as the first hero in disguise. As Superman, he is
always optimistic, always helping the public, always dealing with issues that
seemingly cannot be solved fast enough by law enforcement. As a hero, he takes
matters into his own hands, creates arbitrary rules for his methods and works
as a larger than life figure. As Clark
Kent, he plays the role as an average American adult, trying to work under the stress of
the fast-paced world of news and media. It is interesting to see Superman’s debut and
slow integration into his world, transforming from a meek, mild-mannered
employee, to an indestructible terror to some. His abilities are both
frightening but helpful to those in need. At first, it is only isolated incidents
that humans encounter his ability. However, as he becomes more integrated,
Superman’s identity faces public issues such as copyright infringement and
selling his abilities for entertainment in the circus. Superman has to deal
with the two worlds colliding constantly, the idea of it probably being the
first we’ve seen represented through comics. Humans identify or are obsessed with
this notion of an alter ego; it is always exciting to be surprised by more than
what the naked eye has to offer. The ability that any average man could become
a superhero is attractive to readers, especially young boys who are its primary
audience.
Superman’s role as a champion for
America and a role model for his young audience causes tension between his
indestructible ability and the very human lessons he must teach. Often, his
methods are unorthodox and unique; his abilities are both destructive but
weirdly instructive. Superman’s morality is a main focus point in the comics
and brings back a very familiar phrase: “with great power comes great
responsibility”. But at times I am surprised at how irresponsible Superman can
be. Superman is not beyond going in disguise, infiltrating organizations such
as the US Army or a football team to keep watch on people, scheming or
sabotaging plans or kidnapping people to showcase his terrifying indestructible
ability. One issue involves him kidnapping and drugging an innocent human to
take his place. In the end, his actions are excused after the victim realizes
Superman gave him a chance to be with his love interest. Superman’s methods
sound dangerous, but we learn to accept them as he always seems to save the day
in the end. I sometimes think Superman
can be a troll, using his powers to poke fun at anyone, speaking witty comics
as he deflects bullets, working “behind the curtain” as a hero who cannot be truly
revealed. Working above the law can be a terrifying idea if Superman was a
villain, but because he is a superhero, it seems that his ability to save the
day grants him moral immunity. The aspect of anonymity perhaps makes him feel
less accountable for his actions. His methods sometimes include putting others
in danger, including innocent bystanders to prove his point at times – at one
point he leads a group of partygoers into a mine to prove how unsafe it is: by
destroying it partly. His methods may seem strange but are very visually
effective to young boys who may be toying with the line between delinquency and
good at the time. Even Superman, who has the power to destroy cities, plug dams
and save the damsel in distress, only uses his powers to teach a lesson.
Overall, I was not impressed by the
art but must keep in mind the originality of the content. One unique aspect of
these comics includes the narration style. The author included a voice that
acts almost like an invisible character, the narrator, who leads us through the
action and helping us navigate the world of Superman. Complete with
punctuation, the almost story-like words add a visual element; representing
time, or motion, depicting actions or relaying dramatic irony to the audience
that Superman does not see.
Another aspect of the comics worth
noting is the role of Lois Lane. Her role
is important but also very critical as she seems to be the only strong female lead
worth drawing in this male dominated world. All other women are depicted as
damsels in distress, objects of men or love interests of Superman. Because of
this, it is understandable her ambitious desire to be a newspaperwoman. Other
than hindrances she experiences at work, she is also the object of love for
Superman, a damsel in distress and recurring individual who is constantly saved
by Superman. Could her role as the victim symbolically represent the America
Superman watches over?
Merisa,
ReplyDeleteI never asked myself "What if Superman was a villain?" until I read your post. And like you mention, yes I think the Superman comics would be truly terrifying if Superman was depicted as someone evil. His rules are the only rules, and no one can stop him.
If we were to look at the football episode that you mentioned without changing the words, without changing the images, but viewed Superman as the "bad guy," his whole scheme does not appear to be a scheme executed with good intentions. Where does Superman draw the line between "good" actions and "bad" actions? What is considered righteous, and what is considered manipulative? I don't think Superman knows. As readers, I think the reason we except Superman as the ultimate hero because we place so much trust in him, that despite his crazy plans, things will end up okay in the end (the football player gets the girl, the villain learns his wrongs, etc.).